|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
08.00 |
WELCOME, REGISTRATION AND COFFEE |
|
|
|
CHAIRMAN
Matthew Bocci
Technology and Standards, IP Division
Alcatel-Lucent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SESSION IV
MPLS-TP |
|
|
|
|
|
|
09.00 |
Is MPLS-TP a Reality? |
|
|
|
Overviewing the industry’s movement on MPLS-TP. Providing cost saving analysis for transport moving away from TDM toward packet. Updating the latest standards status, especially on MPLS-TP OAM. Discussing two main deployment options of MPLS-TP implementation: static provisioned MPLS-TP with NMS, and signaled MPLS-TP with GMPLS protocols for MPLS-TP LSP and LDP for PW.
Luyuan Fang, Principal Engineer, Cisco
Nabil Bitar, Director of Data Network, Verizon |
|
|
|
|
|
|
09.30 |
PTN and PSN: Understanding the Two Distinct MPLS-TP Applications |
|
|
|
Explaining the PTN and PSN applications with their diverse operational environments, and providing a comparison of the requirements for the two scenarios. Demonstrating the fundamental differences and similarities of the two applications, and describing which of the proposed MPLS-TP OAM solutions is most suitable for each application.
Nurit Sprecher Nokia Siemens Networks |
|
|
10.00 |
COFFEE BREAK |
|
|
10.30 |
Any Services over MPLS-TP Transport Network |
|
|
|
Proposing a method on how to interwork between "packet transport network" based on MPLS-TP and some network protocols using diversified network services.
Discussing the feature of the proposed models and describing how to build the packet transport network which integrates all of these network services.
Masayuki Takase, Central Research Laboratory, Hitachi |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.00 |
Intelligent Control Plane in Large Transport Deployments Into MPLS-TP Networks |
|
|
|
Detailing the lessons learned from deploying large core transport networks with intelligent control planes and how these apply to MPLS-TP as a transport protocol.
Nigel Bragg, Principal Network Architect, Ciena Corporation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.30 |
MPLS-TP OAM and Resiliency Mechanism |
|
|
|
Discussing various issues of MPLS-TP from functionalities, OAM, control plane and management, resilience, applications and standards. Both theories and practical considerations are covered.
Mike Zheng, USA R&D Center, Huawei Technologies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.00 |
MPLS TP-Pseudowires: Reality or Illusion? |
|
|
|
Recently, there has been some debate as to whether we need to change anything about pseudowires to use them in an MPLS-TP network. Exploring the characteristics of pseudowires that make them a good fit for supporting such services over MPLS-TP.
Matthew Bocci
Technology and Standards, IP Division
Alcatel-Lucent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.30 |
LUNCH |
|
|
|
SESSION V
Seamless MPLS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
14.00 |
MPLS: A Pragmatic Approach |
|
|
|
Taking a closer look at the relative characteristics of the different component flavors of MPLS and how they can be used to support the requirements of a common packet Transport infrastructure
David Saccon, Network Strategy, Ericsson |
|
|
|
|
|
|
14.30 |
Deploying MPLS-TP based Packet Transport Network in Metro/Regional Areas and Interworking with Existing IP/MPLS Networks |
|
|
|
Starting from the application of new Packet Transport technologies in Telecom Italia metro/regional aggregation network, analysing key drivers to the selected solution and interworking scenarios between MPLS-TP and IP/MPLS domains taking into account technology and operational complexity.
Authors: Carlo Cavazzoni, Allessandro D’Alessandro and G. Nervo, Telecom Italia
Carlo Cavazzoni, Transport Innovation Center, Telecom Italia |
|
|
|
|
|
|
15.00 |
Dynamic MPLS TP in a Unified MPLS Environment |
|
|
|
Providing an overview of the features of GMPLS relevant to MPLS-TP Control Plane (addressing, routing, path computation, signaling, traffic engineering, and path recovery). Showing how specific requirements in each subarea can be met using existing GMPLS functions. Concluding with extensions that are required to support the MPLS-TP features not addressed by current GMPLS protocol.
George Swallow
Distinguished Engineer
Cisco |
|
|
|
|
|
|
15.30 |
Enabling Seamless MPLS using LDP DoD |
|
|
|
Describing a real-world network design based on Seamless MPLS concepts. Showing how LDP Downstream-on-Demand (DoD) can be used to meet the access network requirements and describing LDP DoD operation in the context of the network case study.
Authors: Thomas Beckhaus, Deutsche Telekom, Kishore Tiruveedhula and Maciek Konstantynowicz, Juniper Networks
Thomas Beckhaus, Deutsche Telekom |
|
|
16.00 |
COFFEE BREAK |
|
|
16.30 |
Virtual Network System: Splitting Control and Data Plane to Optimize IP and Transport Services at Minimum OPEX |
|
|
|
Analysing the role played by the control and management plane in minimizing the scalability issue while providing a seamless end to end packet based connectivity while taking advantage of the best transport technology in each part of the network.
Elisa Bellagamba Portfolio Strategy Manager Ericsson |
|
|
|
|
|
|
17.00 |
Pros and Cons of MPLS Architecture Options for OTT Video, FTTH and Cloud |
|
|
|
What are the guidelines for designing network architecture?
What is the suitable network architecture for access, metro, service edge and backbone networks?
Pros and cons of introducing Seamless MPLS
Possible migration strategy to the new architecture
Dr. Xipeng Xiao
Head of Network Chief Engineer Office
Huawei Europe |
|
|
|
|
|
|
17.30 |
Comparing Access Packet-based Technologies |
|
|
|
There are now several carrier-grade options available, differing in data plane encapsulations, control plane protocols, and in functionalities such as QoS, OAM, and resilience. Comparing Q-in-Q Ethernet, MPLS-TP, and full IP/MPLS – from technological and deployment perspectives.
Yaakov (J) Stein, CTO, RAD Data COMMUNICATIONS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18.00 |
ROUND TABLE
MPLS End-to-end: a Realistic Paradigm? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CHAIRMAN
Vishal Sharma, Metanoia
PARTICIPANTS
Dr. Xipeng Xiao, Huawei Europe
Thomas Beckhaus, Deutsche Telekom
George Swallow, Cisco
Hector Avalos, Ericsson
Zeev Draer, MRV Christoph Loibl, Silver Server
Rajesh Kumar Sundararajan, ARICENT
Yaakov (J) Stein, RAD Data COMMUNICATIONS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19.00 |
END OF CONFERENCE DAY TWO |
|